Try Skyvern
Overview
Skyvern takes a different route to the same destination as other browser agents: instead of reasoning purely over the DOM, it combines large language models with computer vision, looking at the rendered page the way a person does. That choice pays off precisely where DOM-based agents struggle — forms built by enterprise software vendors, where field labels, hidden inputs and custom widgets make the underlying markup close to unreadable.
The results back the design. Skyvern scores 85.85% on WebVoyager, slightly behind Browser Use overall, but it is the best-performing agent specifically on form-filling tasks. That specificity is the business: the company reports enterprise customers running thousands of procurement automations per week, which is a category of work that is high-volume, form-shaped and expensive to staff.
Skyvern raised $17.5 million and is open source with a commercial cloud on top, which is the familiar and sensible pattern in this space. You can read the code, run it yourself, and buy the managed version when running browser fleets stops being interesting.
Key Features
Vision-Plus-LLM Page Understanding
Reads the rendered page visually rather than relying on DOM structure, which is why it survives the badly-built enterprise forms that defeat selector-based tools.
Best-in-Class Form Filling
The leading agent on form-completion tasks specifically, which is the highest-volume category of real-world browser automation.
Workflow Chaining
Multi-step workflows that pass state between stages, aimed at end-to-end business processes rather than single tasks.
Open Source Core
The engine is open source and self-hostable, with a commercial cloud for teams that would rather not operate it.
Enterprise Procurement Focus
Documented deployments running thousands of procurement automations per week — a narrow but genuinely proven use case.
API and Scheduling
Trigger runs from your own systems and schedule recurring workflows, rather than driving everything from a notebook.
Pros & Cons
Advantages
- Best available agent for form-heavy automation
- Vision-based approach survives markup that breaks DOM agents
- Open source core with a commercial cloud when you want it
- Proven at enterprise volume, not just in demos
- $17.5M funding gives reasonable continuity confidence
Disadvantages
- Lower overall WebVoyager score than Browser Use
- Vision inference costs more per step than DOM-only approaches
- Smaller community than Browser Use, so fewer worked examples
- Narrower general-purpose appeal outside form workflows
Pricing Plans
| Plan | Price | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| Open Source | Free | Self-hosted engine, you provide models and infrastructure |
| Cloud Starter | Usage-based | Managed runs, scheduling, hosted browsers |
| Enterprise | Custom | Volume automation, support, deployment assistance |
Best Use Cases
Skyvern Excels At:
- Procurement, onboarding and any high-volume form workflow
- Legacy enterprise web apps with unreadable markup
- Processes where a human currently retypes data between systems
- Teams wanting open source with a commercial escape hatch
May Not Be Ideal For:
- General-purpose browsing and research tasks
- Cost-sensitive workloads where vision inference is too expensive
- Teams that need the largest possible community
How It Compares
Skyvern vs Browser Use
Browser Use wins on general tasks and community size; Skyvern wins on forms and ships more enterprise scaffolding. If your automation is mostly filling things in, Skyvern is the better tool despite the lower headline benchmark.
Skyvern vs UiPath
UiPath is mature RPA with governance, audit trails and an army of implementation partners. Skyvern is dramatically cheaper to start and does not break when a page layout changes. Large regulated enterprises will still choose UiPath; teams automating a specific painful process should look at Skyvern first.
Final Verdict
Our Recommendation
Skyvern is the specialist worth knowing about. Chasing Browser Use on the general benchmark would be the wrong read: the vision-based approach exists to solve enterprise forms, and on that specific job it is the best thing available. If your automation problem is people retyping data into a vendor portal thousands of times a month, this is the tool to trial, and the open-source core means the trial costs you engineering time rather than a contract. For general browsing automation, Browser Use remains the better default.